Observations From a Modern Day Pragmatist

My purpose in creating this blog is to record personal observations and reflections on matters that I consider noteworthy. What we call life is basically an infinite potpourri of events that are interpreted in our minds, and result in consequences--some within our control, most beyond our control.

Name:
Location: San Francisco, California, United States

Male, 40s; grew up in a Navy family. Lived on East Coast, Gulf Coast, and currently on West Coast US. Served five years in the Navy after graduating from high school. Currently work in healthcare field. Married, no kids. Really enjoy life; stay awake as long as possible each day.

Monday, February 20, 2006

Our Endangered Values

The title of this post is shared with the title of former US president Jimmy Carter's latest book.

Jimmy Carter was president from 1976-1980. I remember the year he was elected. I was in the 7th grade, and a particular class assignment required students to profile their favorite candidate for the presidency. I chose Jimmy Carter, but I can't recall why.

Jimmy Carter was president at the wrong time in our country's history. If there was a time when our country needed a man of such integrity and justice, it is now, the year 2006. Although he didn't leave a very impressive legacy during his presidency, his deeds and accomplishments from the time he left office to the present have compensated for this a hundred-fold. Jimmy Carter is the founder of the Carter Center, a non-profit organization that strives to ease the pain and suffering of the poor in various regions of the world. Teaching farming techniques, building shelters, and eradicating local parasitic infestations are just some of the admirable things the Carter Center is doing. When he's not helping the poor and destitute, he is doing his best to promote world peace as an ambassador. He frequently consults with world leaders on how to to find peaceful resolutions to conflicts.

Jimmy Carter, to me, is someone who actually exemplifies the true goodness of the Bible. He is like a Jedi Knight amidst the hordes of neoconservative, Christian fundamentalist Siths that have hijacked Christianity in this country. He is, unfortunately, is a minority in today's Evangelical Christian Church. In his book, he describes how a core of fundamentalist Baptists took leadership of the Southern Baptist Convention, and changed the charter in a manner that defied traditional Baptist practices. The new leadership called for melding of politics and religion, domination by all-male pastors, exclusion of traditional Baptists form convention affairs, subservience of women, and encroachment on the autonomy of local churches. After much soul-searching, Carter decided to sever his relationship with the Southern Baptist Convention, while retaining his faith as a Baptist in his local church. He notes that during the last quarter century, there has been a parallel right-wing movement within American politics, often directly tied to the attributes of like-minded Christian groups. This new political movement is characterized by:

(my quotes in parentheses)

-special favors fo the powerful at the expense of others (no-bid, billion-dollar contracts to Bechtel, secret energy policy meetings by Cheney?)
-abandonment of social justice (jailing of "enemy combatants," electronic eavesdropping?)
-denigration of those who differ (Fox News anchors, conservative talk show hosts' marginalization of opposing views, notably those coming from Democrats and liberals)
-failure to protect the environment (Bush's refusal to join other countries in reducing carbon emissions(Kyoto accords); drilling in Arctic National Wildlife Reserve?)
-attempts to exclude those who refuse to conform (.."you are with us or against us; highly selective invitations to White House press releases and special "town hall" talks by Bush?..)
-tendency toward unilateral diplomatic action (Iraq war, North Korean nuclear crisis-George W..)
-excessive inclination towards conflict (Iraq war, threats to Syria and Iran, esp. from Rumsfeld)
-reliance on fear as a means of persuasion (color-coded terrorist threat levels, 9-11 card, "mushroom cloud" remarks by Condi Rice...)

Jimmy Carter offers his observations of the new fundamentalists; noting that they share the following beliefs / behaviors:

-Almost invariably, fundamentalist movements are lead by authoritarian males... and within religious groups, have an overwhelming commitment to subjugate women and to dominate their fellow believers (Pat Robertson, The Taliban and any Christian male who insists that his wife not take a job and stay at home)
-although they usuallly believe that the past is better than the present, they retain certain self-beneficial aspects of both their historic religious beliefs and of the modern world (Any San Francisco-hating blowhard or Taliban who bemoans the departure from tradition, yet doesn't give a second thought of using the internet and other hi-tech products, many of which had origins in the Bay Area)
-they draw clear destinctions between themselves as true believers, and others, convinced that they are right and that anyone who contradicts them is ignorant and possibly evil (Bin Laden...Pat Robertson...George Bush..Donald Rumsfeld...Anne Coulter...et. al, et. al.)
-they are militant in fighting against any challenge to their beliefs. They are often angry and sometimes resort to verbal or even physical abuse against those who interfere with the implementation of their agenda (same as above)
-they tend to make their self-definition increasingly narrow and restricted, to isolate themselves, to demagoge emotional issues, and to view change, cooperation, negotiation and other efforts to resolve differences as signs of weakness (the entire Bush Administration)

Jimmy Carter summarizes by identifying three words that characterize this brand of fundamentalism: rigidity, domination, and exclusion. I couldn't agree more. Jimmy Carter is a unique individual whose assessment of today's global conflicts should be respected by all, regardless of political inclination. He is unique in that while he is undoubtedly a man of strong faith, he is very intelligent and discerning; fair and honest. He does not let his intelligence overwhelm his religious faith, and vice versa; despite harsh criticisms from both conservatives and liberals. I wish he would run for president.

Friday, February 10, 2006

Our Kids Are In Danger

Saw the last few minutes of the O'Reilly Factor. Apparently, there is a relatively new game played by our youth that involves "borderline asphyxiation" by intentional hanging, or choking. The temporary deprivation of blood and oxygen to the brain, followed by a rush of blood to the head supposedly creates some sort of high. The game has an underground following. There are even websites, with instructions and probably chat rooms, on the subject. Most parents aren't aware of its existence. O'Reilly interviewed a mother who had lost her 13 year-old kid to this game. She had even warned him of the consequences, but he didn't listen. He accidently hung himself.

Why on God's green earth would a kid play such a rotten game? I know that kids are prone to do all kinds of things--a kid's developing brain is like a sponge, searching for new sensations and experiences to absorb. It is human nature to go out into the world and discover all there is to discover. When I was a kid, some of the reckless things I did were as follows:

-threw rocks at wasps nests (or used garden hose). Why? Just to piss them off, I guess.
-killed honeybees with my bare hands (killed about ten before I got stung; then I quit).
-tried to drink water out of a cactus (got a mouthful of microscopic thorns)
-threw rocks on unspent bullets to see what would happen
-threw toads as high as I could, above asphalt
-shot a bunch of birds with my BB gun
-burned ants w/ magnifying lens
-made prank calls to people
-I had a short streak of theft (stole a seashell from the third-grade classroom) and a classmates notepad; also candy cigarettes from 7-11 (thank God this habit didn't stick)

I guess with the passage of time, this level of pranksterism is minor league. Looks like the new generation wants more exciting and riskier activities. The new generation of kids are growing up with PCs, cell phones, iPods, X-Boxes, digital cameras, etc., etc. In my generation, Atari and PacMan video games were the most hi-tech activities available. Today's kids gobble up the new technology, get bored once the novely wears off, and search for the next big thing.

Here's what parents need to do: TAKE AWAY YOUR KIDS' ELECTRONIC GADGETS, GET THEM AWAY FROM THE INTERNET, AND MAKE THEM GO OUTSIDE AND PLAY. What ever happened to street football, baseball, and basketball? When was the last time you saw a bunch of kids riding bicycles together? The streets are empty on Sundays, because the kids are either playing video games or are surfing the web. They are also getting fat in the process. There is a study that found that several hours of watching the changing screens of a computer terminal has a narcotic effect similar to marijuana. It changes the brainwaves somehow. Maybe this plays a role in today's kids' bizzare behavior. These kids represent our future. We can't afford to allow them to turn into a bunch of techno freaks who are not in touch with real life. So if you are a parent, you need to break your kid(s) off this techno-addiction.